Political uncertainty to continue amid protracted coalition talks
- Germany faces domestic uncertainty as Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservative bloc attempts to avoid either fresh elections or unprecedented minority rule.
- A coalition deal between Merkel and the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) would see the far-right Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) emerge as the main opposition party.
- Government paralysis in Germany has wider ramifications for the EU. French President Emmanuel Macron could see his agenda of reform and deeper Eurozone political integration either delayed or derailed.
National elections to the German Bundestag in September saw Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social Union (CSU) conservative bloc lose eight percent of its share of the vote. The far-right, anti-immigrant and anti-Islam Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party gained 12.6 percent of the vote, becoming Germany’s third-largest party. Merkel’s attempts to forge a coalition between CDU/CSU, the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) and the Greens failed when FDP withdrew from negotiations on 18 November.
Merkel’s former coalition partners the Social Democrats (SPD), which performed badly in the September elections, initially refused any kind of coalition with the CDU/CSU conservative bloc. However, the SPD reversed its decision following an appeal from German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on 24 November. Merkel has so far succeeded in averting another election by attempting exploratory coalition talks with the SPD.
The most likely outcome of the current political impasse is that Merkel’s CDU/CSU conservative bloc will reach a power-sharing agreement with the SPD, although there is no guarantee of a quick settlement. If the talks fail, Merkel’s CDU/CSU bloc would be forced to rule as a minority government – unprecedented in Germany’s post-war history. The likelihood of a fresh election is low, as SDP, CDU/CSU and President Steinmeier are opposed to holding one. However, the possibility cannot be entirely ruled out, and calls for another poll could emerge if all other negotiating options have been exhausted.
The inclusion of AfD as a coalition partner in government is unlikely, even in the event of a fresh round of elections, since no party has shown the willingness to partner with it. Nevertheless, AfD will continue to influence the political debate in Germany for the foreseeable future. Anti-immigration sentiment is likely to persist or even worsen amid concerns about national identity and Merkel’s immigration policies. Events outside Europe and largely beyond Berlin’s control – such as the fate of the peace process in Syria – could improve or worsen the situation.
The immediate ramifications of Germany’s political stalemate for the domestic regulatory environment are mild. CDU will continue to lead the government, preventing any radical regulatory changes. There could be some regulatory change if a future government included the Greens. But they demonstrated a willingness to compromise in November’s failed coalition talks – dropping a proposed ban on combustion engines, for example – and would probably not exercise much weight as a coalition partner.
The impasse could have a wider impact on the EU and could stall momentum behind French president Emmanuel Macron’s Eurozone reform programme. Macron has signalled since his election that a stable and strong Germany is essential to his reform agenda. The erosion of Germany’s traditional stabilising role within both the EU and the Eurozone could further undermine confidence in EU institutions and embolden Eurosceptics and nationalists across the bloc. Right-wing anti-EU sentiment has emerged in numerous European countries and has tended to dilute enthusiasm, even among centrist parties, for EU centralisation. The current crisis in Germany is part of a significant ideological challenge to deeper political integration in the EU.
Scenario A – Success of coalition talks
The success of the talks would see another grand coalition between CDU/CSU and SPD, as ruled from 2005-2009 and from 2013 up until the 2017 elections. SPD is reluctant to take this course of action, claiming that partnering with CDU/CSU has damaged its political credibility, as evidenced by its poor results in the September elections. Given scepticism within the SPD party membership, a grand coalition may only come about if Merkel’s conservative bloc can reach some kind of compromise on key SPD policies.
- A grand coalition would produce more certainty for businesses and stability for the country, although the underlying reasons for the increase in the popularity of the AfD would remain.
- A grand coalition may come at the price of compromise to important SPD demands, such as the abolition of private health insurance, stricter climate protection targets and an end to a ban on some asylum-seekers bringing family members to Germany.
- The relative health of the German economy and centre-left SPD’s influence in coalition could lead to a retreat from austerity, accompanied by more infrastructure investment.
- Such a coalition would probably cooperate with President Macron on deepening European political integration, albeit at a staggered pace.
Scenario B – Failure of coalition talks, minority rule
Talks between SPD and CDU/CSU are not entirely under the control of the leadership of each party. SPD will vote on whether the party can move ahead with official negotiations with CDU/CSU at its national conference in Berlin on 7-9 December. Polls suggest that a majority of party members do not favour a grand coalition. SPD’s youth organisation, Jusos, is also opposed to it.
CDU’s Bavarian sister party, CSU, has nominated Markus Soeder, a strong critic of Merkel’s refugee policies, as its candidate for state premier in 2018 Bavarian elections. CSU’s shift to the right on migration issues could weaken Merkel’s hand in negotiations with SPD, which favours a more open migration policy.
Should these impediments cause talks to fail, Merkel’s conservative bloc could attempt to form a minority government that is tolerated by the other parties. In this scenario, SPD would aim to maintain its independence from Merkel’s bloc while supporting the government on important policy matters, such as defence, security, and European policy.
- Though potentially workable, a minority government could be weak and struggle to pass legislation quickly and efficiently. Issues such as immigration and cultural identity could become more politicised, fuelling increased civil unrest.
- A weakened government might seek to appease AfD voters by pursuing narrower national interests. This could undermine European integrationist policy.
- In this scenario, SPD would try to boost its popularity by moving further to the left to appeal to its traditional support base among working class voters. This would likely mean campaigning for regulations that are favourable to employees.
Scenario C – Failure of coalition talks, fresh elections
Germany could face another national election. Although this is the least likely outcome, it could transpire if all negotiations fail.
- AfD would likely retain a similar share of the vote. The party has entered the Bundestag for the first time and conditions remain largely unchanged since the September elections. The party could even exploit its momentum against the perceived establishment parties.
- Another election could see a lower turn-out as voters experience apathy and fatigue at repetitive campaigns. Reduced turn-out could damage the centrist parties more than the AfD.
- The most probable outcome of a new election would be a similar result to the one that was delivered in September 2017, with greater divisions in German society. The problems of power-sharing would re-emerge, along with the necessity of a negotiated solution. Germany’s strong economy and budget surplus would probably shield the business environment from any shocks caused by the political paralysis.
PGI Intelligence is a risk management consultancy specialising in geopolitical intelligence and corporate investigations, cyber security, and capacity training.
For more information or to sign up for free access to the PGI’s geopolitical risk notification platform, the Risk Portal, please visit https://riskportal.pgitl.com
Your free global geopolitical
PGI’s Risk Portal tool provides daily intelligence feeds, country threat assessments and analytical insights, enabling clients to track, understand and navigate geopolitical threats.
The Risk Portal gives users up-to-date information and analysis on global affairs.
The Risk Portal allows users to visualise information in a unique and instantly understandable way. Mapping filters enable the visualisation of incidents by threat category, time period, perpetrator and target type.
Risk Portal users can upgrade their accounts to include the Report Builder and Country Profile Generator features. The Report Builder allows users to select information, data and images from the Risk Portal and create bespoke reports and emails.
Subscribers to PGI’s Bespoke services receive tailored analysis on specific sectors and geographies of interest, delivered at a frequency they determine.
Subscribe to our Cyber Bytes Newsletter
Keep yourself in the loop with PGI by signing up to our Monthly Cyber Bytes email. You will receive updates, tips and narrative around what has been happening in the world of information security.